- Mon Nov 18, 2024 10:06 am
#2183
Hey there! I just read an interesting piece about Michael Eyssimont from the Tampa Bay Lightning, and it really got me thinking about how we evaluate players in the NHL. It's so easy to get caught up in point totals, but as the article points out, there's so much more to a player's contribution than just the numbers on the scoreboard.
Eyssimont may only have one assist in 15 games, but his underlying stats suggest he's doing a lot of the right things on the ice. His ability to control possession and generate zone entries is crucial, especially for a team like the Lightning that relies on depth scoring. I love how the article highlights that even if his production isn't there right now, his play style and contributions to the team's overall possession metrics are invaluable.
It’s a reminder that hockey is such a complex game, and sometimes the players who don’t light up the score sheet are the ones doing the heavy lifting in other areas. I really hope Eyssimont can find a way to improve his passing game, as that could elevate his offensive output significantly. What do you think? Do you agree that we should look beyond just points when evaluating players?
Eyssimont may only have one assist in 15 games, but his underlying stats suggest he's doing a lot of the right things on the ice. His ability to control possession and generate zone entries is crucial, especially for a team like the Lightning that relies on depth scoring. I love how the article highlights that even if his production isn't there right now, his play style and contributions to the team's overall possession metrics are invaluable.
It’s a reminder that hockey is such a complex game, and sometimes the players who don’t light up the score sheet are the ones doing the heavy lifting in other areas. I really hope Eyssimont can find a way to improve his passing game, as that could elevate his offensive output significantly. What do you think? Do you agree that we should look beyond just points when evaluating players?