Hey there! I just read about Quinn Hughes being a game-time decision for the Canucks against the Sharks, and I can't help but feel a bit anxious about it. Hughes has been such a pivotal player for Vancouver this season, and his absence could really shake things up for the team.
It's great to hear that the injury isn't serious, but with the holiday break coming up, I wonder if Tocchet might play it safe and give him some rest. I mean, as much as Hughes would want to be out there, it’s crucial to think long-term, especially with how much he contributes on both ends of the ice.
What do you think? Should they let him play if he's not 100%? I feel like the Canucks need to be cautious, especially with the playoff race heating up. Plus, it would be a shame to risk aggravating an injury when they could have him fully healthy for the stretch run.
Hey there! I just read about Quinn Hughes being a game-time decision for the Canucks against the Sharks, and I can't help but feel a bit anxious about it. Hughes has been such a pivotal player for Vancouver this season, and his absence could really shake things up for the team.
It's great to hear that the injury isn't serious, but with the holiday break coming up, I wonder if Tocchet might play it safe and give him some rest. I mean, as much as Hughes would want to be out there, it’s crucial to think long-term, especially with how much he contributes on both ends of the ice.
What do you think? Should they let him play if he's not 100%? I feel like the Canucks need to be cautious, especially with the playoff race heating up. Plus, it would be a shame to risk aggravating an injury when they could have him fully healthy for the stretch run.
- By Anonymous